Press Invite
A nationwide event "Rebuilding Republic" is being organised on the issue of Citizen's direct participation in the making of Laws and policies of the country on the eve of Republic Day. In Delhi, a seminar cum panel discussion would be held on January 26, 2012 at 2 - 6pm at Constitution Club Lawns, Rafi Marg.
Key Speakers at the event: Yogender Yadav, Dr. BD Sharama, Admiral Ramdas, Vandana Shiva, Sandeep Pandey, Praful Samantra and Seema Mustafa
Rebuilding Our Republic
For
quite some time now it has become evident that policies being adopted
by the government and Laws being made by Parliament are not reflecting
the views, wishes or the needs of the majority of the people of the
country. Many policies are clearly against the wishes and interests of
the people but have been pushed through by the government and in
Parliament for the commercial interests of large Indian and foreign
corporations.
The
same is evident from the manner in which the government and Parliament
has dealt with the Lokpal bill. While all polls, surveys and referenda
were showing that more than 80% people favoured the Jan Lokpal bill, the
government introduced a bill bore little resemblance to it, and
defeated the very purpose of a Lokpal by making it a body selected and
controlled by the government and making it dependant on government
controlled investigating agencies. When amendments moved by the
opposition parties to cure some of these defects were likely to be
passed, the government filibustered and engineered disturbances and the
bill was left hanging in the air.
We
are constantly told that Parliament is supreme and that we must respect
Parliamentary democracy and that it is inherent in this form of
democracy that the people must leave decision making to the wisdom of
their “elected representatives”. We know that these representatives are
generally getting elected by use of money power and often even muscle
power. That is why the major political parties are lining up to induct
even those persons who have been kicked out for corruption by the
corrupt BSP government on the eve of the elections. We are seeing that
only candidates of large, established and moneyed parties have any
realistic chance of getting elected, mainly because of the nature of our
electoral system in which honest
and hardworking social workers who have contested elections as
independants or candidates of small political fare poorly in elections.
But
even more importantly, we find that after getting elected, these
elected representatives normally do not take decisions on policies and
laws by finding out what people want, and often such decisions are taken
(usually at the level of the party high commands) on the basis of self
interest (as in the case of the lokpal bill) or on extraneous and often
corrupt considerations. That is why Acts which vitally affect millions
of persons like the SEZ Act get passed in Parliament in minutes without
any discussion, and the Lokpal bill remains stuck for decades.
Parliament these days get adjourned frequently due to disturbances
created sometimes by a few M.Ps, and only a small fraction of its time
is devoted to real work.
We
are told that we have to live with this “imperfect democracy” and that
other countries have also learnt to similarly live with such
imperfections. But what we are seeing is not an imperfection in the
working of our democracy but virtually a total breakdown, where, as we
are seeing, the popular will is rarely getting reflected in governance
and law making.
The
challenge before us therefore is: Can we not put in place a system
whereby the views of the people are directly taken into account in major
policy decisions and laws of the State, rather than these being decided
by the “elected representatives”? Such a system is already in place in
tribal areas through the PESA Act which provides for the Gram Sabha
(the collective of all adults in the village) to take all public
decisions pertaining to the village, though mostly this has remained
only on paper.
Some
skeptics ask: How do you expect people to understand complex issues
like the Lokpal bill, nuclear energy or Genetically modified foods.
“These are matters which can only be understood by experts.” But are our
M.P.s or Ministers experts on these subjects? After all they are
deciding such critical matters which affect large sections of society.
If they can take a view on it by taking into account the views of
experts, so can the people. Some people who feel that they understand
the issue sufficiently will vote on their understanding. Others will go
by the experts that they trust. Manu may not vote, which is the case
even for elections. But this would still be better than decisions being
taken only by these “elected
representatives” who are often elected on a small fraction of the vote
in elections dominated not merely by inadequate knowledge of the
candidates, but by money and muscle power and caste considerations.
These “elected representatives” are far easier to manage by commercial
vested interests than the entire electorate. Therefore, it would be much
safer to trust the people than these elected representatives.
Whatever
the challenges and difficulties in putting in place such a system, the
time has certainly come to discuss this. We need to see how we can
strengthen and deepen our democracy and ensure that we really get a
truly participatory democracy and thus a government which is really run
by the wishes of the people. Participatory democracy is an idea whose
time has come.
No comments:
Post a Comment