The UN General
Assembly overwhelmingly adopted a Saudi-drafted resolution on Syria that
expressed "grave concern" at the escalating violence in the country but
India was among the 31 nations that abstained.
The
193-member General Assembly passed the resolution that denounced
Syria's crackdown on its people and demanded that the country lockdown
it’s chemical and biological weapons.
The
resolution also deplored "the failure of the Security Council to agree
on measures to ensure the compliance of Syrian authorities with its
decisions".
The resolution got 133 votes in favour, while 12 countries voted against and 31 countries, including India abstained.
An
earlier draft of the resolution had provisions that demanded regime
change, called on President Bashar Al-Assad to resign and asked
countries to place sanctions against the country for the violence and
killing.
India
was not in favour of these provisions and a senior member of Indian
delegation had said that officials "worked over time" to get these
demands dropped from the resolution.
Others
countries like Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa too were not in
support of the provisions demanding regime change and sanctions.
The
Indian Ambassador to the UN Hardeep Singh Puri had also held several
rounds of discussion with his Saudi and Qatari counterparts over the
provisions of regime change and sanctions in the resolution. Unlike a UN
Security Council resolution, the General Assembly resolution is not
legally binding. It is only moral and symbolic in nature.
The
resolution strongly condemns "the continued widespread and systematic
gross violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms by the Syrian
authorities and pro-governmental militias".
Addressing
the 193-member General Assembly before the vote on the resolution, UN
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said the violence and acts of brutality
being reported in Syrian cities may constitute "crimes against humanity
or war crimes".
He
said despite repeated verbal acceptances of the international envoy
six-point plan endorsed by the UN Security Council, the Syrian
government and the opposition continue to rely on weapons and not
diplomacy, believing that they would win through violence.
The Syrian crisis has escalated in the last 17 months when the uprising against President Bashar Al-Assad's regime began.
More than 10,000 people have been killed and thousands others displaced by the fighting between government and rebel forces.
Efforts
to restore peace and stability in the troubled nation were dealt a huge
blow when the UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan announced that he was
resigning from his post, six months after his efforts to end the
violence and find a political solution to the Syrian crisis yielded no
results.
Ban
said the violence and bloodshed in Syria was "avoidable" if the Syrian
government had from the beginning of the uprising not responded to
peaceful demonstrations with brutal force, including mass round-ups and
torture.
He
said observers had predicted at the start of the conflict that
unchecked spread of violence in Syria would lead to a rise of
radicalisation, extremism and terrorism.
"The next step was also forewarned: a proxy war, with regional and international players arming one side or the other."
“Now,
we face the grim possibility of long-term civil war destroying Syria's
rich tapestry of interwoven communities. This would have tragic
implications for Syria's people and could affect stability across the
region. We must not let this prediction come true," Ban said.
He
said mediation to solve the Syrian crisis can only succeed if there is a
commitment to solving conflict through dialogue and real leverage to
back it up.
Annan too had blamed a divided international community and UN Security Council for lack of action to stop the violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment