On being asked about their donors
under RTI, CPI provides information. All other national parties BJP, INC, NCP,
BSP, CPM refuse saying they do not come under RTI
CIC to hear the complaint on 26th
Sept after a year and half of filing of complaint
Political parties behavior completely
opposite to their stated position of trying to bring in transparency
New
Delhi: Sept 22, 2012: On being asked questions through
RTI on their largest donors and the manner of these donations by Association
for Democratic Reforms (ADR), all national political parties except for CPI
declined to give the information. While CPI provided the information about
their largest donors, their addresses, the mode of payment of these donations,
etc., other parties either didn’t reply or simply said that they did not come
under RTI.
In a letter
signed by their then general secretary Mr A B Bardhan, CPI said that it is a
Public Authority as the organization is substantially financed directly or
indirectly by government funds. It also said that they have an internal
appellate authority in case we were not satisfied by the information received.
INC (Indian
National Congress) however returned the RTI letter along with the postal order.
In a letter signed by Mr Motilal Vohra, it said that since AICC does not come
under RTI, it was returning the letter along with the postal order fee.
BJP did not even
respond to the RTI application. Neither did BSP. NCP replied but
said that it didn’t have enough man-power to provide the information asked for.
CPI(M), also
returned the RTI application along with the postal order. Through a letter
singed by Mr Hari Singh Kang, Member Central Secretariat, CPI(M), it said that
CPI(M) is not a public authority as per the provisions of RTI Act and hence
under no obligation to provide the information.
Making these
replies the basis, ADR had filed a complaint with CIC in Mar 2011 to direct the
political parties to give this information. This complaint has now come for
hearing along with another complaint of Mr Subhash Agarwal, a RTI activist.
ADR said in a
statement that the leaders of all political parties publically maintain that
they are committed to transparency and probity in the functioning of political
parties. However when it comes to the implementation, their behavior is
completely opposite. These replies bring to the fore the biggest farce that our
democracy is plagued with – the opaque functioning of political parties with no
space for engagement with the citizens and no willingness to open themselves to
public scrutiny.
Association for
Democratic Reforms and National Election Watch in 2008 had also won the CIC
judgement making IT returns and contribution reports of political parties
available in the public domain. Even at that time all political parties had
opposed to part with this information. CIC had however directed the Income Tax
authorities to make this information public as there was huge public interest
in the information.
It is common
knowledge that the political parties get lot of benefits and facilities from
various govt departments. As a recent report of ADR and National Election Watch
showed, they have huge income and all of their income is tax exempt.
Political
parties get substantially financed by a very large amount by getting tax
exemption on all their income. In addition all the major political parties have
been also provided facilities for residential and official use by Directorate
of Estates (DoE). They have been given offices and accommodations at prime
locations like Akbar road, Raisina road, Chanakyapuri etc and are charged only
a token of money as rent or dues. These facilities are not just provided to
them at marginal rates but their maintenance, upgradation, modernization,
renovation and construction is also done at state expense. A large amount of
money is also spent by Election Commission of India on political parties for
giving electoral rolls.
Doordarshan
and AIR also provide free broadcast facilities to the political parties. If
closely seen, the money spent on that basis actually runs in crores. State
funding is also given for publicity of political parties during elections.
It is indeed very
surprising that the political parties who at one end claim to work under
transparent and people centric manner have flatly refused to work in such a
fashion.
ADR, had filed a complaint on 23rd March, 2011 with the
CIC to get information from political parties. The hearing now is scheduled for
26th September. The letter from CIC also has also mentioned that the
matter is serious and of wider implications. The case is thus going to be
placed before full bench.
Contact Details
Media and Journalist Helpline
+91 80103 94248
Email: adr@adrindia.org
|
Anil Bairwal,
National Coordinator
National Election Watch, and
Association for Democratic Reforms
011 4081 7601,
+91 9999310100
adr@adrIndia.org,
|
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar
IIM Ahmedabad
Founder Member National Election Watch, Association for
Democratic
Reforms
+919999620944
|
Prof Trilochan Sastry
IIM Bangalore
Founder Member,
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
+919448353285,
|
State Co-ordinators: Association
for Democratidc Reforms
|
No comments:
Post a Comment